Method 2 of 5

Mapping of NGOs and stakeholders

Who in the community has influence on decisions, who is interested in change, and who needs support in defending their interests.

Logos: German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWE), GIZ, International Renaissance Foundation, Civil Society Development Forum, project partner, coat of arms of Ladyzhyn

Civil society organisations

97 — organisations identified in the 2026 study. In total, 112 organisations declared activity in the community, but some of them are inactive; therefore the denominator for the activity indicator is 97.

97

NGOs identified

denominator for the activity indicator

Source: Report 02 “Stakeholder Analysis”

14.43%

active NGOs

of 97 identified

Source: Report 02 “Stakeholder Analysis”, “Conclusions and Recommendations”, item 1

13 (13.4%)

NGOs took part in the survey

Source: Consolidated analytical report on the needs assessment for transforming participatory development processes in Ladyzhyn TC

7 (7.21%)

NGOs took part in the focus group

Source: Consolidated analytical report on the needs assessment for transforming participatory development processes in Ladyzhyn TC

≈ 27 of 97

NGOs with a sports focus

in the survey — 2

Source: Consolidated analytical report on the needs assessment for transforming participatory development processes in Ladyzhyn TC

0

environmental organisations among the 39 stakeholders

two NGOs with environmental activities were identified only at the focus group

Source: Report 02 “Stakeholder Analysis”

39 stakeholders using the D4St method

Each stakeholder was scored from 1 to 10 on two criteria: “Interest” and “Influence”.

Highest interaction priority — 64.1% (25 groups)

High interest and influence.

Officials of the relevant executive bodiesCity mayor and deputiesCharitable Foundation “MHP — for the Community”Municipal institution “Local Economic Development Agency of Ladyzhyn”Standing committeesNGO “Open Space of Community Development”Deputy corpsExecutive committeeVeterans and their family membersLarge businesses of the community (MHP, DTEK Energo, BTU)Families of missing personsFamilies of fallen defendersCultural figuresIndividual entrepreneursHealthcare workersEducation workersAssociation of Coal Communities of UkraineUkrainian Red Cross SocietyCultural sector workersCommunity youthChildren and youth of the communityInternational Organization for Migration (IOM)Public union “Network of Local Economic Development Agencies”Regional Development AgencyFamilies of serving military personnel

Source: Report 02 “Stakeholder Analysis”, “Stakeholder Mapping”

Need help defending their interests — 35.9% (14 groups)

Lower level of influence and interest.

People with disabilitiesAthletes and sports sector workersElderly peopleInternally displaced personsLocal mediaCommunity residentsChildren of the communityVulnerable categories, including low-income and large familiesChildren deprived of parental careYouth CouncilIDP CouncilFamilies in difficult life circumstancesBusiness CouncilRegional media

Source: Report 02 “Stakeholder Analysis”, “Stakeholder Mapping”

Effectiveness of communication channels

38.71%

effectiveness of 4 channels without active intervention

official websites · Facebook groups and pages · targeted address distribution · paper announcements

Source: Report 02 “Stakeholder Analysis”, “Conclusions and Recommendations”, item 2

Atypically low influence

Six groups have medium interest but low influence: families of serving military personnel, community youth, Youth Council, IDP Council, Business Council, community residents.

Three groups have high interest and low influence: local media, IDPs, athletes and sports sector workers.

Source: Report 02 “Stakeholder Analysis”

Conclusion

There are more active organisations in the community than expected, but influence over decisions is concentrated in the authorities and large institutions. The groups most interested in change — youth, IDPs, military families, entrepreneurs — have few levers of influence and need adapted tools: consultations, working groups, joint projects. The environmental area is not represented among stakeholders, despite the large enterprises in the community.

Source: Report 02 “Stakeholder Analysis”, “Conclusions and Recommendations”

← Back to the consolidated study← Regulatory frameworkOnline survey →

The project "Just Transition of Ladyzhyn Community: Development through Participation and Partnerships" is implemented by the NGO "Civil Society Development Forum" with the support of the International Renaissance Foundation and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, on behalf of the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWE).

This material reflects the views of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the position of the International Renaissance Foundation, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH or the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWE).