Key figures

The base year for comparison is 2021, before the full-scale invasion.

5,189

appeals and proposals in 2021–2025

Source: Report 04 “Analytical Report on Public Demand”, sec. 2

× 3.1

increase in citizens' appeals compared with 2021

+207.2%

Source: Report 04 “Analytical Report on Public Demand”, sec. 2.1

18

local policies in the breakdown

according to the appeals classifier

Source: Report 04 “Analytical Report on Public Demand”, sec. 2.2

“Overcoming consequences”

stage of the community by average score

the earliest of the four stages of the Concept of Renovation

Source: Report 04 “Analytical Report on Public Demand”, sec. 2.4

Most requested policies

The list of most requested policies has not changed since the invasion began, but the number of appeals has grown — above all in social protection, municipal utilities and agrarian policy.

Number of issues in 2021–2025, five largest policies

Social protection
2,815
Municipal utilities
1,140
Other (culture, youth, sport, etc.)
502
Agrarian policy and land relations
298
Housing policy
192

Source: Report 04 “Analytical Report on Public Demand”, sec. 2.2

Degree of impact by policy

Appeals were distributed across 18 local policies. The report assigns 13 of them to one of the four stages of the Concept of Renovation of Ukrainian Communities. By the average indicator, the community is at the earliest stage — “Overcoming consequences”.

Overcoming consequences — 5 of 18 policies

Sharpest “surge” in problem issues (twofold or more):

  • social protection
  • housing policy
  • transport and communications
  • legality, law and order, prevention of discrimination
  • education, science and innovation

Source: Report 04 “Analytical Report on Public Demand”, sec. 2.4

Reconstruction — 4 of 18

Problem issues are above the pre-war level, but by less than a factor of two:

  • municipal utilities
  • agrarian policy and land relations
  • family and gender policy, protection of children's rights
  • other

Source: Report 04 “Analytical Report on Public Demand”, sec. 2.4

Recovery — 3 of 18

The level of problem issues is declining:

  • healthcare
  • activities of local executive authorities
  • labour and wages, occupational safety

Source: Report 04 “Analytical Report on Public Demand”, sec. 2.4

Development — 1 of 18

Issues are resolved on time; no problems reported:

  • defence capability, sovereignty, interstate relations

Source: Report 04 “Analytical Report on Public Demand”, sec. 2.4

How participation tools work

People make more and more appeals, but almost exclusively through the simplest individual tool — the appeal. Collective tools do not work: not a single e-petition in five years reached even 5% of the threshold.

1

public consultation in 5 years

Source: Report 04 “Analytical Report on Public Demand”, sec. 2.1

5

e-petitions in 5 years

each collected from 0 to 4 of the 100 signatures required

Source: Report 04 “Analytical Report on Public Demand”, sec. 2.1

Participatory budget: number of projects

2023
82
2024
55
2025
0 — not held

Source: Report 04 “Analytical Report on Public Demand”, sec. 2.1; 2024 decline — 33%

Conclusion

The structure of public demand points to a focus on basic needs: social support, municipal services, access to resources, support for IDPs. Data on demand and on the degree of impact by policy should be integrated into the community's strategic documents, including the Just Transition Plan, prioritising policies at the “Overcoming consequences” stage.

Source: Report 04 “Analytical Report on Public Demand”, sec. 3 “Consolidated recommendations”

The project "Just Transition of Ladyzhyn Community: Development through Participation and Partnerships" is implemented by the NGO "Civil Society Development Forum" with the support of the International Renaissance Foundation and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, on behalf of the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWE).

This material reflects the views of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the position of the International Renaissance Foundation, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH or the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWE).